Motivating or procrastination?

In trying to clarify my thinking and whilst wondering how I would present my research plans to others I decided to write a power point and a short introduction to the work. Any comments gratefully received.

Research presentation


School Age Girls, Motherhood, Education and Transition


It is widely recognized that it is difficult for young people to express their opinions, needs and feelings verbally (Moss, 2007)  This can be more challenging when the young people concerned are a vulnerable and stigmatized group who need a safe, secure and ethical context in which to express themselves and have their ‘voice’ heard. This, small scale, research project aims to allow  young women, who became mothers whilst still attending school, to tell of their own lived experience.



There is a large body of literature on how adolescents shape their sense of identity, how they come to grips with their changing bodies, how their cognitive capacity develops, consolidates and how relationships with parents and peers change (Giddens, 1991, Goffman, 1990, Harter, 1990, Head, 1997)

Most strikingly this body of work examines how adolescents become aware of and unite their various selves. Definitions of identity are many, related but with slightly different emphases.  Erikson (1950, 1959, 1964, 1968, 1974, 1985) who is best known for his theory of psychosocial development  discussed the term as describing a person or social group’s sameness and differences.  He states

“A sense of identity means being at one with oneself as one grows and develops: it also means, at the same time, a sense of affinity with a community’s sense of being at one with its future as well as its history or mythology “(1974)

These young women are also often stigmatised due to their educational status.  Subsequent governments have seen the solution to the group of young people labeled ‘Not in Education, Employment or Training’ (NEET) as only situated in paid employment.(Percy- Smith, 2000) The fact that this group is not homogenous and in fact comes from very diverse situations has not stopped this ‘one size fits all’ approach.  Teenage mothers are an example of one of the specific groups included within the NEET group and therefore can be doubly stigmatised, for having a child and being NEET, even though appropriate educational opportunity may not be available.

The constructions of teenage mothers by professionals, including those there to offer support are often negative, so much so that this support is often seen as coming with a substantial dose of stigma.(Aarvold and Buswell, 1999, Fessler, 2008)

Formby et al. (2010)considered whether motherhood was viewed as a catastrophe by the young women themselves and concluded that this is not the case, rather that it can make good sense for some young parents rather than the opposite as often viewed by policies.

The researchers commitment to this focus has come from eight years of part time working with these young women and taking an innovating role in extending the education offer of the Pupil Referral Unit (PRU) to include 17 and 18 year olds in ‘study programmes’. This provision has developed organically from the PRU’s Head’s recognition and provision for a perceived need.  The 2014 policy to have all 17 and 18 year olds engaged in education or training (DFE, 2014) is now affecting this provision as funding for this group is ill defined .  This leaves the young women with feelings of not ‘belonging’ in the education system as their needs are not catered for, but censured if they do not take part in an educational offer which rarely meets their needs.  Their identity is seen by outside society as neither a fully- fledged mother, or a student, heightening the ambiguity of their position and their experience of stigma and othering.

The research project will explore the lived experiences of mothers who are still taking part in compulsory education and will examine how their lived experience impacts upon their educational experiences.




Ethnography provides a suitable methodological approach to allow the researcher to become closely connected to the group and to investigate the variety of truths which apply to this group’s education, examining this through the lens of their own experience and that of those who work with them.

As a research methodology ethnography is defined by its focus on a single setting, organisation or group. It shows concern with the full range of social behaviours in that setting, with the researcher spending a substantial amount of time in the field and becoming involved in the lives of the group, as Walford (2008), highlights “The predictable patterns of human life are the focus of the inquiry”.

The advantage of including the young women in the design of the research includes the fact that they have the most clear cut knowledge of their situation and needs. They will raise research questions that because of the researcher’s positionality she probably would never identify.  It is essential to the research values that the ‘voice’ that is heard is theirs, however it  will be necessary to recognize that these young women may not represent all School Girl Mothers (SGM) , that these finding may not be generalizable for this reason. However a wider reading of literature in this field (Arai, 2009, Caldeira et al., 2012, Cater and Coleman 2013, Duncan, 2010) may allow for what Bassey (1999:12) calls ‘fussy generalisations’, these can arise from a specific research project and have some use in a related context.

Encouraging the participants to work creatively is a method which hopes to allow access to different parts of the participant’s awareness, Prosser (2008). In communicating in this more holistic way, the researcher hopes to enhance empathic insight, and help us pay attention to reality in different ways, making the  ‘ordinary become extraordinary’ Weber (2008)

A huge amount of the research on issues of teenage pregnancy has examined social exclusion, social support and educational outcomes (Arai, 2009, Caldeira et al., 2012, Cater and Coleman 2013, Duncan, 2010). There is little emphasis on the young woman’s own view of her identity, position in society and sense of belonging, in research from the United Kingdom.  Some studies in the USA have explored these issues but often with an emphasis on racial identity (Levy, 2011, Musick, 1993, Sriyasak et al., 2013, Wilson and Huntington, 2006).   The researcher hopes to explore the issues of belonging and identity especially in relation to the young women’s own educational expectations.




AARVOLD, J. & BUSWELL, C. 1999. Very young motherhood: whose problem? Youth and Policy 1-14.

ALDERSON, P., & MORROW, V. (EDS.). 2011. The Ethics of Research with Children and Young People: A Practical Handbook. , London, Sage.

ALLEN, L. 2008. Young people’s ‘agency’ in sexuality research using visual methods. Journal of Youth Studies, 11, 565-577.

ARAI, L. 2009. Teenage Pregnancy: The Making and Unmaking of a Problem (Health & Society Series), Policy Press.

BANKS.M 2001. Visual methods in social research, London, Sage.

BARNARDOS 2012. Are we nearly there yet Dad. London: Barnardos.

BASSEY , M. 1 May 1999. Case Study Research in Educational Settings, Buckingham England ; , Open University Press.

BERA. Arts Based Educational Research [Online]. Available: [Accessed 22/11/2015 2015].

BEST, A. 2007. Introduction. In: BEST, A. (ed.) Representing youth:metholodgical issues in critical youth studies. New York: New York University Press.

BLOUSTEIN, G. 2003. Girlmaking: A cross cultural ethnographyof the processes of growing up female., Oxford, Berghahn Books.

CALDEIRA, S., STATE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN PARANÁ, C. B., MERIGHI, M. A. B., UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO, S. P. B., JESUS, M. C. P. D., FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF JUIZ DE FORA, B., OLIVEIRA, D. M. D., DOMINGOS, S. R. D. F., GONÇALVES, R. & UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO, S. P. B. 2012. Being the mother of a pregnant adolescent: experiences and expectations. Acta paul. enferm., 25, 110-114.

CATER, S. & COLEMAN , L. 2013. ‘Planned’ teenage pregnancy: Views and experiences of young people from poor and disadvantaged backgrounds, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, The Homestead, 40 Water End, York, North Yorkshire, YO30 6WP.

DFE 2014. Participation of

young people in


employment or


Statutory guidance for local authorities. In: DFE (ed.). London: DFE.

DUNCAN, S. 2010. Teenage Parenthood: What’s the Problem?, The Tufnell Press.

ERIKSON, E. 1974. Dimensions of a New Identity, New York, W.W, Norton.

FESSLER, K. 2008. Reclaiming a Spoiled Maternal Identity: Young mothers experiences and rejection of stigma, Michigan, University of Michigan.

FORMBY, E., HIRST, J. & OWEN, J. 2010. Pathways to adulthood: reflections from three generations of young mothers and fathers. In: DUNCAN, S., EDWARDS, R. & ALEXANDER, C. (eds.) Teenage Parenthood: What’s the Problem. London: Tufnell Press.

GALLACHER, L. G., M 2008. Methodological immaturity in childhood research? Thinking through ‘participatory’methods. Childhood, 15, 499-516.

GIDDENS, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Polity Press.

GOFFMAN, E. 1990. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Penguin Psychology), Penguin.

GOLDMAN-SEGALL, R. 1998. Points of viewing children’s thinking:A digital ethnographer’s journey, Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.

HARTER, S. 1990. Self and Identity Development. In: FELDMAN, S. & ELLIOTT, G. (eds.) At the threshold:The Developing Adolescent. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

HEAD, J. 1997. Working with  Adolescents. Constructing Identity, London, The Falmer Press.

HIRST, J. 2003. Voices of experience: Muslimand African Carribean teenagers’insights on pregnancy and parenting, Sheffield, Julia Hirst.

HUNLETH, J. 2011. Beyond, on or with: Questioning power dynamics and knowledge production in ‘child oriented’research methodology. Childhood, 18, 81–93.

JAMES, A., JENKS,C.& PROUT, A. 1998. Theorising Childhood, Cambridge, Polity.

LEVY, L. W., S. 2011. A community arts based new media empowerment project for teenage mothers. Studies in Art Education, 52, 292 -308.

MIZEN, P. 2005. A little ‘light work’? Children’s images of thier labour. Visual Studies, 20, 124-139.

MORROW, V. R., M 1996. The Ethics of Social Research with Children. Children and Society, 10, 90-105.

MOSS, J., DEPPLELER, J. ,ASTLEY, L., & PATTISON, K. 2007. Student researchers in the middle: using visual imagesto make sense of inclusive education. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 7, 46-54.

MUSICK, J. S. 1993. Young, Poor and Pregnant: The Psychology of teenage motherhood, New Haven and London, Yale University  Press.

PERCY- SMITH, J. 2000. Policy Responses to Social Exclusion: Towards Inclusion?, Open University Press.

PINK, S. 2013. Doing Visual Ethnography, London, Sage.

PROSSER, J. A. L., A. 2008. Introducing Visual Methods. ESRC National Centre for Research methods.

RAGGI, A. A. S., M. 2004. Using visuals to release pupils’ voices: emotional pathways into enhancing thinking and reflecting on learning. In: POLE, C. (ed.) Seeing is believing? Approaches to visual research. London: Ellsevier.

SRIYASAK, A., AKERLIND, I., AKHAVAN, S., AKADEMIN FÖR HÄLSA, V. O. V. & MÄLARDALENS, H. 2013. Childrearing among thai first-time teenage mothers. The Journal of perinatal education, 22, 201-211.

THOMSON, P. E. 2008. Doing visual research with children and young people., Abingdon, Routledge.

TINKLER, P. 2008. A fragmented picture: reflections on the photographic practices of young people. Isual Studies, 23, 255-266.

WAGNER, J. 1999. Visual studies and seeing kids’ worlds. Visual Sociology, 14, 3-6.

WALFORD, G. 2008. How to do Educational Ethnography Kindle Edition. The Tufnell Press.

WEBER, S. 2008. Visual Images in Research. In: KNOWLES, J. G. A. C., A.L. (ed.) Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples, and

Issues, . London: Sage.

WILSON, H. & HUNTINGTON, A. 2006. Deviant (m)others: the construction of teenage motherhood in contemporary discourse. Journal of social policy, 35, 59-76.

WRIGHT, C. Y., DARKO,N., STANDEM,P.J. & PATEL,T.G. 2010. Visual research Methods: Using cameras to empower socially excluded black youth. Sociology, 44, 541-555.




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s